This Question is Answered

2 "helpful" answers available (5 pts)
7 Replies Last post: May 23, 2008 2:01 PM by btkrausen  
Click to view btkrausen's profile Bronze 4 posts since
May 21, 2008

May 22, 2008 9:16 AM

Setup Problem: User Mapping


My AD structure is broken out under multiple OUs. Should I just point to the root of the domain?

My AD allows anonymous queries due to applications that were written in house, so I haven't specified a admin. Step 1 connects ok, but I get:

No users were found using the specified configuration. Try changing the base DN, user filter or username field.

Is ADAM a requirement?

Click to view mtstravel's profile KeyContributor 1,625 posts since
Apr 2, 2007
May 22, 2008 10:05 AM in response to: btkrausen
Re: Setup Problem: User Mapping
ADAM is not needed for LDAP integration with AD. You could use the top of your tree for the baseDN. You could also create another OU to house all the OUs currently containing Accounts. You would then move the account OUs to the new parent OU. Any group policys should move with the OUs.
Click to view mtstravel's profile KeyContributor 1,625 posts since
Apr 2, 2007
May 22, 2008 2:41 PM in response to: btkrausen
Re: Setup Problem: User Mapping
That would be the correct baseDN given the example. You will probably need to add an adminDN and password which can be in the form of johndoe@abc.com for the adminDN.
Click to view mtstravel's profile KeyContributor 1,625 posts since
Apr 2, 2007
May 23, 2008 7:28 AM in response to: btkrausen
Re: Setup Problem: User Mapping
Try pointing your baseDN to an OU that has users in it for a test such as OU=someOU,DC=acb,DC=com. If it still can not find users try adding an adminDN and password even though your system is configured for anonymous authentication.
Click to view mtstravel's profile KeyContributor 1,625 posts since
Apr 2, 2007
May 23, 2008 1:59 PM in response to: btkrausen
Re: Setup Problem: User Mapping
Any difference with a BaseDN that contains users?